<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Comparative studies on Political Science Research Methods</title>
    <link>https://fanghuiz.github.io/ps0700/tags/comparative-studies/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Comparative studies on Political Science Research Methods</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>&amp;copy; Fanghui Zhao 2019 &lt;i class=&#34;fas fa-tree&#34; style=&#34;color: #40a990;&#34;&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://fanghuiz.github.io/ps0700/tags/comparative-studies/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Q&amp;A Week 7: Comparative Studies</title>
      <link>https://fanghuiz.github.io/ps0700/post/2019-02-22-comparative/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://fanghuiz.github.io/ps0700/post/2019-02-22-comparative/</guid>
      <description>Table of Contents    Can you explain more about the connection between Mill’s method of difference and experiments? Is the concern for external validity problems only apply to method of difference, or method of agreement as well? Is selecting on dependent variable only a problem for method of agreement? The lecture mentioned that method of difference has trouble estimating “multiple causes”. What are some examples of “multiple causes” cases?</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>